Economy · evidence operations

Municipality evidence coverage

17 cities · 149 towns

This manifest turns confidence into a municipality-by-municipality work queue. It shows which public model inputs are present, which local evidence and validation gates remain, and the next defensible data action. Missing evidence is never treated as zero.

Cities172021 SGC type CY

Towns1492021 SGC type T

Tier C64Public-source estimate

Tier D102Profile only

Evidence-domain coverage

166

Official geographic identity166/166

model-input · 0 missing

Census population and dwellings166/166

model-input · 0 missing

Employer-business activity158/166

model-input · 8 missing

Resident-income measure156/166

model-input · 10 missing

Audited municipal fiscal context5/166

context-only · 161 missing

Model-relevant municipal administrative data0/166

confidence-gate · 166 missing

Direct municipal validation0/166

confidence-gate · 166 missing

City and town manifest

3 shownJSON →

All types Cities Towns Tier C Tier D All tiers

All regions Northern / Nord Prince Albert Regina–Moose Mountain Saskatoon–Biggar Swift Current–Moose Jaw Yorkton–Melville

Evidence coverage, confidence gates and next actions for every Saskatchewan city and town.
Municipality	Region	Tier	Public inputs	Local context	A/B gates	Next action
Martensvillecity	Saskatoon–Biggar	C	4/4	missing	0/2	Add a governed model-relevant municipal administrative source and a second local corroborating domain for Tier B.
Saskatooncity	Saskatoon–Biggar	C	4/4	available	0/2	Add a governed model-relevant municipal administrative source and a second local corroborating domain for Tier B.
Warmancity	Saskatoon–Biggar	C	4/4	missing	0/2	Add a governed model-relevant municipal administrative source and a second local corroborating domain for Tier B.

Tier B requires governed model-relevant municipal administrative evidence plus a second local corroborating domain. Tier A additionally requires direct municipal review, reconciliation, an organizational steward and an agreed refresh cycle.